MUNASABAH AYAT DALAM SURAH AL-QALAM PERSPEKTIF SEMITIC RHETORICAL ANALYSIS (SRA)
Keywords:
Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA), coherence; Interpretation, Al-QalamAbstract
Criticism of the Quran has been a part of Quranic studies for some time. One of the figures who criticized the Quran is Richard Bell, an orientalist, who, in his book titled "The Quran Translated, with a critical re-arrangement of the Surah," cast doubts on the authenticity of the Quran. Bell mentions the presence of added verses that are considered not in line with the original text, including in Surah al-Qalam, specifically in verses 10-16. Additionally, he also notes that verses 51-52 appear to lack relevance to the verses before or after them. The purpose of this research is to examine whether the structure of Surah al-Qalam exhibits symmetry in accordance with patterns of parallel, concentric, or mirror-symmetrical arrangements at various levels of the text. The research methodology employs analysis, which is used to process data and address the research questions. This research approach adopts the concept of "Coherence" to find coherence in the structure of surah al-Qalam using the Semitic Rhetorical Analysis methodology. This research is a type of library research, which involves collecting data from various sources such as books, scientific documents, journals, etc. The results of this research show that the application of Semitic Rhetorical Analysis in Surah al-Qalam produces a series consisting of 3 parts and 8 sections of text structure, which form a mirror concentric construction (AB/x/B’A’). The results of the analysis also show that there is a connection between parts, which shows good coherence and verse structure. This finding refutes Richard Bell's view because each verse in Surah al-Qalam is able to be symmetrical with other verses from the lowest to the highest text level
References
Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah, Tafsir Al-Azhar. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional PTE LTD. 1401.
Al-Biqa’I, Ibrahim bin umar. Nazm ad-durar fi tanasub ayat wa suwar. Kairo: Dar al- kitab al-islamy, 1480.
Ashur, Ibnu. Muhammad Thahir Ibnu Ashur, at-tahrir wa al-tanwir. Tunisia: al- Dar al- Tunisiyyah li al-Nashr, 1984.
al-Razi, Fakhru al-Din. Mafatih Al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dar ihya’ al-Thurath al-‘Araby, 1420.
Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. al-Tafsir Al-Munir Fi-aqidah wa Al-Manhaj. Damaskus: Dar al- Fikr, 1991.
Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq. Mengenal Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) Dalam Kajian Al- Qur’an Kontemporer. Malang: Literasi Nusantara, 2022.
Penerapan Semitic Rhetorical Analysis ( SRA ) Pada Surah Al-Qiyamah,” Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 8, no. Juni (2018), https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2018.
“Examining Semitic Rhetoric: A Qur’anicSciences Perspective,”Jurnal Ushuluddin 28, no. 2 (2020).
“Re-Analyzing the Structure of Surah Al-’Alaq Using Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA): A Critical Study on Cuypers’ Methodology of Analyzing Qur’anic Structure,” Studia Quranika 13, no. 1 (2021).
Re-Examining the Qur’anic Structure in Qs. Waqi’ah Using Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (Ankara: internasional conference on social science, 2023).
“The Coherence of Surah Al-Dzariyat in Perspective of Semitic Rhetoric,” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah 20, no. 1 (2023): 71, https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i1.16021.
“Uncovering The Interconnected Text Structure of QS. Al-Mulk: A Semitic Rhetorical Analysis,” in Ases IV. International Scientific Reserach Conference. Istanbul: Ases IV. International Scientific Reserach conference, 2023.
Az- zamakhsyari, Mahmud bin umar. al- khasyaf ‘anil haqaiq gha’amid at-tanzil, Ar- Riyad: maktabah abikan. 538 H.
Bell, Richard. The Qur’an Translated, With a Critical Re-Arrangement of the Surahs. Edinburgh: T. & T Clark, 38 George Street, 1939.
Cuypers, Michel. A Qurʾānic Apocalypse: A Reading of the Thirty-Three Last Sūrahs of the Qurʾān, Terj. Jerry Ryan. Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2018.
Fi Nazm Surah Al-Maidah: Nazm Ayi Al-Qur’an Fi Daw’ Manhaj Al-Tahlil Al- Balaghi. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq, 2016.
“List of Contributors” Dalam The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies,” Https://Www.Ideo-Cairo.Org/En/Michel-Cuypers-p-f-j-2/ (28 mei 2021, 2021.
“Semitic Rhetoric as a Key to the Question of the Nazm of the Qur ’ Anic Text,” Of Qur’anic Studies 13, no. 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2011.0003.
Hadi, Sutrisno. Metodologi Research, (Yogyakarta: Psikologi Ugm, 1990)
Hendri, Ari. “Problematika Teori Munasabah Al-Qur’an,” Tafsere 7, no. 1 (2019),https://doi.org/https://journal.uinalauddin.ac.id/index.php/tafsere/articl e/viw 10009.
Katsir, Jalil Al-Hafidz ‘imadu ad-din abi al fida ismail bin katsir. Tafsir Al-Qur’an al- adzim, jilid 14, (Kairo: lil thabi’I an-nasr wa tawaji’, 774).
Muhammady, Abdullah Abu Bakar. Suqiyah Musafa’ah, Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi,“Struktur Surat Al-Hijr Perspektif Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA),” Jurnal Reflektika 17, no. 2 (2022)
Qurtuby, Abdullah Muhammad bin Ahmad bin abi bakar bin farh al-Anshary khojarozi syamsuddin, al-Jami’ul li-ahkami Al-Qur’an. jilid 19. Kairo: Dar Al-Kitab Mesir, 1384.
Quthub, Sayyid. Fi Zilalil al-Qur’an (Beirut: Dar Syuruk, 1972).
Dadan Rusmana, Metode Penelitian Al-Qur`An Dan Tafsir. Jawa Barat: Pustaka Setia. 2015.
Shihab, Muhammad Quraish. “Tafsir Al-Misbah Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al- Qur’an,” Volume 14. Ciputat, Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2006.
Zaenab, Cut. “Bantahan Terhadap Argumentasi Orientalis: Textual Criticims of the Qur’an ( Studi Kritis Tentang Tuduhan Kesalahan Penyalinan". Tesis: Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, 2022.
Sinai, Nicolai. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction (Edinburgh: Endinburgh University Press, 2017)
1_(1).jpg){kind=logo}
